The recent tragic shooting at Ft. Hood, got me thinking about a video of a lecture I recently watched.
The lecture was given by Massad Ayoob: policeman, competitive shooter, firearms historian, defense instructor, highly-sought expert witness, and the preeminent authority on the judicious use of lethal force in the US. In this lecture (which is taught to law enforcement officers, attorneys, and private citizens) he mentioned that after the shooting at Columbine high school in 1999, the standard response to an active shooter changed.
Before Columbine, the standard response was for officers arriving on-scene to wait for a negotiation team to arrive. If that wasn’t possible, then they would at least wait for there to be a large enough body of officers that they could swarm the shooters en masse.
The obvious problem with this tactic is that this waiting period gives the killer(s) more time to kill.
A lot of analysis was done of the massacre at Columbine and a new protocol was developed. This new protocol was specifically designed for situations where there was a killer in an area where the victims had little or no ability to defend themselves (such as in schools where it is illegal to possess self-defense weapons). In this new protocol the goal is to take down the killer immediately. Officers are trained to engage immediately.
Sgt. Munley, the brave woman police officer who responded to the shooting at Ft. Hood last week, was trained in this new protocol. She got the call, went to the scene, and immediately engaged Maj. Hasan and ended the killing spree.
It is sad comfort, but comfort nonetheless, that our law enforcement professionals to learn from these events; and that the knowledge gained does lead to better tactics that do eventually trickle down to the brave men and women we hire to keep us safe. It’s horrible to imagine what Maj. Hasan would have done if Sgt. Munley had just sat around and waited for backup.